![]() Distinguishing intraretinal microvascular abnormalities from retinal neovascularization using optical coherence tomography angiography. 2012 22:276–82.Īrya M, Sorour O, Chaudhri J, Alibhai Y, Waheed NK, Duker JS, et al. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Vascular abnormalities in diabetic retinopathy assessed with swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography widefield imaging. Schaal KB, Munk MR, Wyssmueller I, Berger LE, Zinkernagel MS, Wolf S. Reevaluating the definition of intraretinal microvascular abnormalities and neovascularization elsewhere in diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography. Lee CS, Lee AY, Sim DA, Keane PA, Mehta H, Zarranz-Ventura J, et al. 2020 127:786–806.Įarly Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Design and Baseline Patient Characteristics: ETDRS Report Number 7. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs - an extension of the modified airlie house classification: ETDRS Report Number 10. Comparison of diabetic retinopathy classification using fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. Soares M, Neves C, Marques IP, Pires I, Schwartz C, Costa MÂ, et al. 2019 62:190–5.Ĭlassification of diabetic retinopathy from fluorescein angiograms: ETDRS Report Number 11. ETDRS grading of diabetic retinopathy: still the gold standard? Ophthalmic Research. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL, Klein RE, Lee PP, Agardh CD, Davis M, et al. Multimodal imaging assessment of vascular and neurodegenerative retinal alterations in type 1 diabetic patients without fundoscopic signs of diabetic retinopathy. Sacconi R, Casaluci M, Borrelli E, Mulinacci G, Lamanna F, Gelormini F, et al. Combining OCTA and WF-CFP is the best performance to detect NVE and NVD.Įarly photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: ETDRS Report Number 9. Combining WF-CFP and OCTA further empowered concordance values in detection of NVE and NVD. OCTA provided almost perfect values of inter-rater agreement in NVE, NVD and IRMA detection. Inter-rater agreement in detection of NVE, NVD and IRMA was substantial, fair and moderate, respectively. By combining WF-CFP and SD-OCTA, inter-rater agreement in detection of NVE, NVD and IRMA was 0.93, 0.94 and 0.89, respectively. OCTA scored values of inter-rater agreement of 0.86, 0.87 and 0.92 in detection of NVE, NVD and IRMA, respectively. ![]() Inter-rater agreement by using WF-CFP in detection of NVE, NVD and IRMA was respectively 0.62, 0.22 and 0.55. Thirty-one eyes from 21 patients (10 males, mean age 63 ± 15 years) were included. The degree of agreement between the two raters and between different techniques (WF CFP, OCTA, WF CFP combined to OCTA) were measured with Cohen’s Kappa coefficient. Two readers independently analysed WF-CFP, SD-OCTA and the overlay of the two techniques. All patients underwent WF-CFP and OCTA in the same day. Patients with treatment naive severe non-proliferative DR or proliferative DR were prospectively enrolled. To detect retinal neovascularization elsewhere (NVE), of the optic disc (NVD) and intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA) in treatment naive diabetic retinopathy (DR) and compare these findings by using 90° Wide-Field Colour Fundus Photography (WF CFP), Wide-Field Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) and the combination of WF CFP and OCTA through overlay software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |